The Court of Appeal has today handed down
judgment in 89 Holland Park (Management) Limited v Dell. The appeal concerned whether significant
costs incurred by the Appellants in relation to disputes with a neighbouring
landowner were recoverable as service charges under sweeper provisions in the
Respondents’ lease.
At first instance, the FTT held that
the service charges were recoverable. However, this was overturned on appeal in
the UT and the Appellants appealed to the Court of Appeal.
The Court of Appeal has dismissed
the appeal. The Court found that Judge Cooke was correct to conclude that the
costs are not recoverable under the provisions of the lease relied on by the
Appellants below and also found that the costs are not recoverable under the
definition of General Expenditure (a new point on appeal).
The decision reiterates that context
is key when determining the intended scope of general words in sweeper
provisions.
Mattie Green (led by Mark Loveday) acted for the successful Respondents, instructed by Amanda McNeil and Hollie Jordan-Wright at Howard Kennedy LLP.